Right now I believe that the most dangerous substance on the planet isn’t nuclear waste, or radon gas, or even polonium. Its hormones.
But you don’t have to take my example as proof. Let’s look at, oh, say,
Resilient In The Wrong Direction
Right now I believe that the most dangerous substance on the planet isn’t nuclear waste, or radon gas, or even polonium. Its hormones.
But you don’t have to take my example as proof. Let’s look at, oh, say,
Athena and I had a discussion about a year ago. We forecasted this. The DeKalb Police (read: Vernon Jones) succumbed to political pressure that had no basis in logic or reality. In a stunning disregard of the facts and a fantastic embrace of manipulative emotion it was decreed that Tasers would no longer be employed. You see, someone had died as a result of its use so it must be an inherently evil device.
For the uninitiated, the Taser offered police officers a last ditch weapon they could employ before using deadly force. Yes, it is a bit disturbing to watch a person being Tased. By now we’ve been inundated with video of persons shaking and screaming as a result of being shocked. But I have it on good authority that bullets are more gruesome to behold. The difference here is that we’ve grown up with a lifetime’s worth of television images of people being shot. Operant conditioning at its finest. The question I have not heard uttered once, in any forum is this: Prior to doing away with that option for police officers how many people were Tased that would have been shot were it not for the Taser? No one, anywhere at the political level exercised a modicum of initiative and spoke from a position of truth. The sad fact is that in the balance Tasers save lives. Don’t take my word for it. Find the studies and look at the deployment history of departments that have had the courage to continue to use it.
The genesis of the conversation Athena and I had about Tasers was the idea that people squirm at the sight of unscripted violence. People’s instinctive, lizard-brain reaction to witnessing one person visit violence on another is that it must be wrong. And while a Taser is a weapon of violence, its use is governed by a myriad of laws and regulations. The men and women that deploy it are rigorously screened, indoctrinated, and trained. There are multiple layers of oversight and accountability within our society with regards to violence. Over the course of many years and through excessive refinement society has dictated to those that protect it the standards by which violence may be employed. The two most basic are OCGA 16-3-21 and 17-4-20.
Such discussions are merely academic though. The gospel truth here is that the people shot by the police entered an arena of confrontation. This is not necessarily the worst part of the equation. The most destructive portion of this is the fallacy and pandering that has transpired in its wake. The embrace of comfortable narrow-mindedness and worst-common-denominator cheerleading merely papers over cracks. The lack of intellectual rigor and klieg light posturing only serves to remove larger chunks from society’s mainstream while empowering a select few. It only digs the trenches deeper.
Put down your run-home-to-momma paper thin logic and your lazy paradigms. Get cozy with the cold bathwater of experience that is larger than the bounds of your television. You can rail against inexorable logic and universal truths or you can set out to test the hypothesis's of life yourself. Why are we required to give inordinate amounts of time in the public debate to those that have nothing to offer but thinly disguised paranoia that has reached narcotic levels?
The AJC's self-congratulatory tripe that it continues to trot out is a greater disservice to public safety than thugs on a robbery spree. The undertone of the tortured lexicon employed by the AJC implies at every step that malfeasance and cover-up are the order of day. That the only possible explanation for 12 people killed at the hands of an instrument of state power is blood lust and a secret campaign to euthanize the black population. That police agencies are out of control and drunk with power. Why is the idea that there just might be little pockets of evil in this world so hard to believe? That there might just be a small number of people in this world that can't be reasoned with. Notice I used the terms ‘small’ and ‘little’ in the previous two sentences. That is because even though the number of shootings is above a mythical statistical mark it still does not reflect the daily reality of over 99.9% of the population. Does anybody get that feeling after reading another journalistic hit piece in the AJC?
Ares
Another Vernon Jones Production is in the works. This time it’s the county’s long, drawn out, excruciatingly desultory search for a new police chief. Not content with the current candidate pool, Uncle Vern had to seek out his own brand of corruption. For the full back story I direct you to that paragon of journalistic virtue, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Sandwiched in a forest of commercial ads you find “Ex-Dallas chief up for DeKalb police job”.
According to the AJC, the three actual finalists were the product of a search committee appointed by Jones. The article also said that Jones had hoped to find a female candidate, but no female candidates could be recruited. This is because women are much smarter than men. Jackie Barrett was still at an investment seminar and couldn’t be reached. Beverly Harvard wants to see how that new Ikea furniture looks in her office at the airport before she’ll throw her name in the ring.
The absolute best part of the entire piece comes from
So Athena and I were discussing the blog today and the subject of my potty mouth came up. Specifically, the frequency and positioning of the F-Bomb. It’s been said by many that swearing is what a person does when they don’t know how to properly express themselves. I have no problem expressing myself, but my urges to pontificate profanely stem from two sources. One, I have been the beneficiary of a long tutelage under many masters in the
I think I understand what Athena was driving at. If your blog becomes a profanity-riddled rant your on that slippery slope moving downhill towards oblivion. Sort of like getting an e-mail from someone written with the Caps Lock on: You hear them yelling in your head while you’re reading it. Nonetheless, there is a middle ground to be found here. I think there will be times when no other words will do. In the interest of maintaining some approximation of dignity I’ll strive to keep it above board.
Ares
Nothing’s going to happen. When I say nothing’s going to happen, I mean to the body politic in this country. They may be some furniture moving happening on Capitol Hill, and there may be a change in the majority, but the song remains the same. In some respects we may be a little worse for the wear. Regardless of the outcome there are battalions of lawyers already lathering up on both sides to claim fraud and malfeasance. This is now standard in our elections: Argue the process if you don’t like the outcome. The tin foil hat brigade works itself into a tizzy about electronic voting machines and election stealing. (Elections were stolen long before computers.) If their side loses there is a large chunk of the electorate that will believe it simply has to be fraud on some level. And, of course, the media is only too happy to gleefully report every person who ever disagreed with anyone. Case in point: There are about six people in this world that don’t agree with Saddam Hussein getting the death penalty, and all six are getting face time today.
The biggest mistake that will be made by Wednesday is that one side will claim victory. Whoever is holding the majority in Congress will be doing so by a thin margin. If the Democrats win they will most likely call it a mandate, which it is not. It’s is simply a lot of voters holding their collective noses. I have a sinking feeling that if Democrats attain the majority they’ll be like a teenage boy that finally gets a girl to sleep with him: So overwhelmed by the prospects that they fumble and fidget and squander the opportunity. If Republicans retain both houses they’ll say……I’m not sure what they could say with a straight face. “I promise we won’t suck as bad”?
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, we’re no better than we were on Monday. Regardless of what falls where the electorate will be about equally divided and really pissed off at the other side. Which is exactly what benefits both parties. The more time we spend throwing rocks at each other the less time we spend paying close attention to what elected officials do. We used to use divide and conquer on other countries. (Now we just conquer.) Seems to be working out pretty well domestically for the people in power.
Ares
Is there anyone, anywhere in this state whose EEG even twitches at the idea of the governor's race? To paraphrase P.J. O'rourke, how the f*** did we end up with these two quibbledicks vying for helicopter rides? Let's roll through the options.
First we have Sonny, a man that couldn't excite 5 year olds on a playground. He does get points for chutzpa, what with that whole "I'll change the flag if you elect me, honest" move he pulled. The truly fascinating aspect of that is watching the indignation of people that feel betrayed by that issue. Oh my god! You mean a politician lied to you? Couldn't happen to a nicer group. Aside from that, can anybody name one thing Sonny has done to.....well can you name anything he's done? Yes, state services took a hit. Our mother works for the state and her pay took it in the shorts over the past few years. But Sonny inherited an economy that was on Ex-Lax. And let's face it, unless it can be attacked by the National Guard there isn't too much a governor can do about too much.
Mark Taylor reminds me of Amway for some reason. The entertaining thing about Mark Taylor is that I haven't watched a politician beg this hard in years. He's using babies and puppies in his commercials for Christ's sake. Maybe we can get someone with some personality to loan him a cup or two, at least until the election is over. He's my question for the electorate. Mark has been in the co-pilot seat the whole time Sonny's been governor. Every time Mark says Sonny's administration sucks isn't he getting some splatter on himself? Got a question for Mark. What have you done, ever, that makes you qualified to be governor. Being elected to the number two spot is not a testimony to the depth of your character. If you had been a captain of industry you could at least say you had, you know, done something. Oh, my mistake. Just read your bio. It says you're an executive in your father's company. Boy, I bet that interview was tough. Sounds like you know what hard work is.
This leads to a larger question I've been toying with for a while now. What is the point in having a governor? (I know, it's a rhetorical question. It's not like we have an alternative here.) Day to day stuff in the world of governance is carried on by career bureaucrats. People that move the ball forward in this world are average Joes and Jans that endure the political mood swings of pencil necks that think they're anointed because they were 5 percentage points more popular than someone else. The people that get the roads built, teach your kids, maintain the parks, and come when you call 911 don't have the option of being an executive in their father's company. Most of those people show up for work every day because they feel theirs is a job worth doing and they derive some satisfaction by being of use to their fellow man.
That said, the office of governor can be extremely important to the citizens of a state. Just ask everyone that voted for Kathleen Blanco. Although she fell flat on her face, I don't think the problem was Kathleen. She was the product of a system where your qualification for governance is based on your popularity. As Hurricane Katrina showed us to the tune of a thousand dead bodies, politics shouldn't be an anyone-can-play game. We need a better vetting process. Fire and police services require rigorous training before you're given power over other humans. What do politicians have to do? Spend a lot of money, that's what. The problem we run up against as citizens is what I call the natural gas cul-de-sac. (And while we're on the subject of gas and governors, thanks for that particular fucking
It's been more than a little fun watching the Kinky Friedman run for governor in
The name we should see on the ballot is Shirley Franklin. She's about the only politician in
Ares