Friday, June 15, 2007

Ares and Athena Wish List

Apologies for the overlong post that follows. We’ve been having a discussion for a while now about what’s not being said in the political theater. What passes for discourse is little more than staged sound bytes. If we could rub the political lamp and get the genie to grant wishes what follows would be the discussion this country would have when it chose leaders. Any of the below items that do come up tend to not survive longer than a few news cycles. The list isn’t some manifesto; just us thinking out loud. It isn’t all-inclusive either, just the big things we see missing from the discourse. As with all things in this blogspace, it is offered with the “IMHO” tag.

A & A Wish List

1: A reasonable, pragmatic approach to addressing health care. This is a unique issue as almost everyone that touches this topic agrees that it’s broken on some level. Included in this is a serious discussion about the raging gaps in mental health care. In the end, somebody actually doing something, anything, as opposed to making speeches and changing the topic.

2: A pragmatic discussion about social security that based on fiscal realities. This, along with all other topics, would have to include a disclaimer up front that changes some people aren't going to like are going to be required. In this as with all things, politicians need to get over their opinions and listen to experts.

3: A serious discussion about the role and factor of personal debt in this country. I'm not as insistent that politicians actually do something in this case. I'm more interested in them using political clout and legislative threat to coerce the financial community into being more responsible. Congress and the executive branch aren't financial experts and the more they tend to mess with these things the more they tend to screw them up.

4: Serious effort at infrastructure upgrading. Every single jurisdiction in this country is patching together an aging, arcane infrastructure. 85% of the infrastructure in this country is in private hands. They are doing no or the bare minimum of upgrading, with the exception of the telcom industry. Something like six and a half trillion dollars in upgrades will be needed in the next generation in this country. Nobody is even talking about how to begin to approach that.

5: The congressional appropriations process is an absolute travesty. The earmarks that dot every single piece of funding legislation that get pooped out are criminal. First and foremost on the list: The Department of Defense. The half-trillion dollar defense budget has numerous programs that are orders of magnitude beyond projected cost, which the DoD continues to support anyway. Added to this are numerous weapons systems that the military isn't all that keen on having, but congress uses as a federal jobs program. This is not like herding cats: The majority of spending goes to about a half dozen defense contractors in this country. Why is the government accepting a level of incompetence and graft that a high school dropout wouldn't tolerate from a home repair contractor?

6: Serious discussion about a long term strategy in the war on terror. Yes, it is a war. Yes, we are engaged whether we want to be or not. Pull whatever demagogue positions there are about the war in Iraq out of this equation and start actually thinking about the issue at hand. This war will be 80% non-kinetic, but there will still be times we have to kill people. Get cozy with that fact, and formulate a plan for the big picture. (Best suggestion, make everyone read Tom Barnett.)

7: A serious discussion about energy policy. Global warming will have to be completely removed from this discussion, as too many people are too deeply emotionally invested in the idea. Fix one and the other will follow anyway. This has to go beyond improving the CAFE standards and getting people to drive hybrids. Making people plug in their cars and manufacturing enormous amount of ethanol merely moves the energy consumption to a different part of the grid. A complete broad-spectrum approach is needed. This area is ripe for a Manhattan Project style approach, and the first one to claim that position will probably have the political high ground.

8: Lobbying and influence buying needs to be addressed on an adult level. The only people that think the current system is reasonable are those that benefit from it. Aside from being blatantly criminal it's an insult to regular people that play by the rules in this world. Here's a novel idea: Why don’t we hold Congressmen to the same ethical standard we hold cops to. The occasional comp'd dinner is as far as you can go when it comes to accepting gifts, and even that should be viewed with a wary eye.

9: A serious, dispassionate review of the "War on Drugs" is needed. Almost 40 years of effort has wrought appalling violence and incredible levels of incarceration. We need to ask ourselves if some radical, sacred cow-busting approaches wouldn't yield better results. Whatever rationale people are clinging to about the evils of marijuana will probably thin out even more and the baby boomers start confronting terminal illnesses in greater numbers over the next 10 or 15 years. Again, a complete, across the spectrum review is needed; not more laws and more jails.

10: It’s time for a new political party. A serious one, not one thought up at Ralph Nader’s mommy’s kitchen table. We’re not the first ones to say it, and we won’t be the last, but there’s not a shit’s worth of difference between the two biggies anymore, and we all know it. I’m still trying to forget H. Ross Perot’s venture into national politics, but good grief, somebody do SOMETHING. (Ares note: I actually voted for Perot, mainly because he had actually done something with his life besides politics.) The last time we had a new political party that stuck in this country was just before the Civil War. The soil is ripe for some innovative reinvention, especially as the baby boomers move off the stage.

In reading over this list it appears to me that the thing we need most is decisiveness and a willingness to try new things. We need to look down on the floor of our debate houses and see lots of broken rice bowls and dead sacred cows. Innovation and exploration is our birthright, not our peril.

Ares and Athena

Genocide, The Game You Play At Home

I’ve got a question that’s been stuck in my head for a while now. Why is it that after self-induced lightweight slaughter in Palestine it’s referred to as “sporadic violence”, but a bomb in Baghdad means an intractable civil war is at hand? A quick consultation of my Funk & Wagnalls shows that they both fit the civil war descriptor pretty well. There is some strange violence-labeling algebra being applied. The tragic-comic relief of the entire episode in Palestine was when the “government” was dissolved. Guess this means all those employees Palestinian Park Service and National Archives won’t be getting their regular paychecks.

While we’re in this neighborhood I’ve got another question stuck in my brain box. Where is the Muslim engine of indignation at the slaughter that’s taken place in Palestine? Every time a Palestinian gets killed by Israeli troops in retaliation for a suicide bombing the chest thumping Arab media machine works itself into a lather. I guess they view these as noble deaths. If there is one bright side that might come out of this, it’s that to the average Palestinian, (Mohammed Six Pack, if you will) Israel seems pretty reasonable in the context of their own leadership. Why in the name of the almighty are we giving so much as a nickel in foreign aid to this place?

Ares

Update: I was feeling pretty alright about this post....until I clicked over to Michael Totten's latest. As is usually the case after I read his stuff, I'm feeling pretty small. I'll simply implore you to read his latest as I offer a hearty "Yea! What he said!" in concurrence.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Nobody CAIRs

Happy news about one of the organizations I love to hate. Turns out CAIR’s membership rolls have been falling faster than the President’s approval rating. They’ve dropped from 29,000 in the year 2000 to less than 1,700 in 2006. Oh, and the bonus statistic: Pew Research estimates there are only 2.3 million Muslims in the U.S. This is significant because it’s less than half the number CAIR used to pimp, which means their “market share” is even more pathetic. Seventeen hundred out of 2.3 million is almost statistically non-existent.

Let’s do a little comparison shopping, shall we. According to the FBI, in 1995 there were 1,100 members of the North American Man Boy Love Association. Aum Shinrikyo, the apocalyptic cult that released sarin gas on the Tokyo subway and released Anthrax on several other occasions, currently has 1,500 to 2,000 members. Jim Jones’ People’s Temple “church” boasted 3,500 at its height, and nearly a thousand of those drank the kool-aid. Are we starting to see the statistical company they’re keeping? Now if we could just get the media to stop pretending they represent anyone.


Ares

Sunday, June 10, 2007

All Things Not Considered

I came up with a new drinking game the other day at work. While listening to NPR: Every time they say “Congressional Republicans” or “Congressional Democrats” take a drink of your beer. Every time they use the terms “failure” or “quagmire” in relation to the war in Iraq take a shot. If you wanna play Dublin Rules you have to take a shot every time they say “President Bush”.

Ares

Thursday, June 07, 2007

Media Whores Part II

Mrs. Ares and I were at a hole in the wall last night having dinner. CNN spewed forth from a black box near the ceiling on today’s fear of the day: The “TB Patient”. (We’ll put aside for a moment that Mr. TB is a world class asshat.) The topic may have been Mr. TB but the theme was fear. The pure and simple peddling of angst and unknown. He’s a little test you can do at home, if you even still watch the news. Look how many segments are loaded with the words fear, uncertain, doubt, concern, possible, or deadly. Charged words that designed to induce an emotional state in the viewer. (Hard to talk about this stuff without sounding like a conspiracy theorist. I assure you this is the absolute last thing I am implying.) Ultimately, the news media is selling a product. The product is their version of information. Getting the facts correct is a distant second in priority. Uncertainty is designed to keep you turning in, which in turn keeps the ad revenue flowing in.

Shortly after Hurricane Katrina I went to a preparedness seminar put on by a large corporate sponsor. The audience was about 200, mostly civilians with a few public safety people thrown in. Good information on how to get yourself ready. One of the last speakers was a retired CDC official. After his very common sense presentation that only tangentially touched on terrorism there was a Q & A session. The first one to shoot his hand in the air was a pudgy middle aged guy in a suit. He was pretty earnest when he asked what he should do to prepare for the dirty bombs. The CDC guy sighed and the public safety people rolled their eyes. The civilians leaned forward and were fully attentive to the speaker. A patient and lengthy answer, loaded with facts and statistics, was delivered by the CDC guy. Four follow up questions from other members of the audience made it clear that facts weren’t sinking in.

There are 300 million people in this country. Over forty thousand of those die in car accidents every year. Half of those accidents are alcohol related. Sixteen thousand people are murdered, most by people they know. Cardiovascular disease killed over 800,000 in 2004. Thus far dirty bombs have killed exactly no one. In the event of a dirty bomb more people will be killed in traffic accidents attempting to flee than from radiation. But the body politic is swallowing the line that dirty bombs are the thing to fear in their lives. Overweight smokers that live in the suburbs and commute over 50 miles a day primarily fear gamma radiation. This is learned behavior, and guess where it was learned?

Barry Glassner, in his absolutely excellent book Culture of Fear, talks at length about this idea. Culture of Fear is probably the most infuriating book you will ever love. One little factoid from the book is worth repeating. During the ‘90’s the murder rate declined by about 20%(if memory serves, Athena has my copy of the book). The reporting of murder by the main stream media rose by 600%. Guess how we see our world? Not as it is but as it is presented to us. Folks, there are an enormous amount of people going forth into society each day. What is truly amazing are all the bad things that don’t happen.

Ares